Preparing to Write An Introduction
While it is impossible to provide advice for every academic subject and every professor's "pet peeves," the advice that follows should assist students preparing introductory paragraphs for many general assignments. Writers should always speak to professors about personal likes/dislikes and the conventions of the field of study.
The Writing Consultants who helped make up this list agree that, in general, these techniques hold true for many courses and assignments.
Types of introductions to avoid:
Other flaws common to introductions:
The "telegraphic" sentence: Here a writer uses the first person to tell a reader what is going to happen. We have all seen this pattern:
Academic writing tends to adopt a more subtle approach, as in the revised example:
Not a cheerful topic, but the tone is correct for these readers.
Good ideas for introductions:
Orienting readers to the topic: Some faculty members will urge witers to "dive right into" the paper. This can lead to trouble if the reader does not know why the writer is beginning where they do.Try to find a balance between engaging and orienting the reader and having too much "fluff".
An introduction is a great test for the writer--it maps the rest of the paper and will quickly show whether the topic is too broad or too complex. When writing the introduction, a writer should imagine themselves as the reader. If they had not read the paper before, what would a reader expect next given what they have already read? Are there topics in the essay that are not briefly mentioned in the introduction? If so, include a mention of these topics.
Focusing the introduction: The goals just mentioned could, if abused, lead a writer to write an introduction that is pages and pages long. Remember, the introduction should not contain every bit of detail in the paper, and it should not include support for a thesis (save that for the body of the paper). An introduction might, however, include the reasons why the writer and reader should care about the topic.
A reader now expects the paper to talk about Norris' use of humor in an otherwise Naturalistic text. Were the essay to include discussions of other novelists or Norris' other work in more than a contextual way, the reader would be surprised. Were the writer to try to cover all those in the introduction and then write a paper on the topic, it would be huge! Better to pick one aspect of the Naturalism (such as this novel's humor) and stick to it.
Back to 'Getting Started'
Checked & proofread, fall 2018, Griffin Myers, Writing Consultant