|
 And he went a little further,
and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, 'O my Father, if it
be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I
will, but as thou wilt.'"
From The Gospel According to
Matthew, 2nd Ed., Richmond: University of Richmond, n.d.:
p. 50
Reader's Questions
- Consider what Jesus is asking
of God here, and what Jesus decides to do. How is Jesus denying
his own instincts? Which ones? How would Nietzsche read Jesus'
decision to do "as thou wilt" in the Passion narrative?
...the savage lives within
himself; social man lives always outside himself; he knows how
to live only in the opinion of others, it is, so to speak, from
their judgment alone that he derives the sense of his own existence."
From Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Essay
on Inequality, p. 136
Readers' Question
- How would Rousseau read the
passage by Nietzsche? Would Rousseau's "savage man"
be capable of interpreting his "animal instincts" in
the way that Nietzsche claims, as "a form of guilt before
God"? Would Rousseau's civilized man be capable? Why or
why not?
- In a broader sense, how do
Rousseau's depiction of natural and civilized man differ from
Nietzsche's depiction of humans in these stages of civilization?
RETURN
TO ESSAY TWO |
Denying One's
Instincts