Directive commentary is commentary written
in a controlling way, "fixing" the problems and forcing your own
opinion upon the writer. "The teacher [or commentator], like an editor,
freely marks up th[e] writing - circling errors, underling problem areas
and inserting comments" (Straub
np). Directive comments very often appear in statement form, usually in
a sentence written in the imperative. For example, instead of asking a student
to rephrase or express differently a phrase like "short and sweet,"
the commentator will write "Avoid clichés." Sometimes directive
comments are not even complete sentence, such as "dangling modifier",
"noun - verb agreement", or "sp" for a spelling error.
Directive commentary can also appear in question form. An example of a directive
comment in the form of a question would be "Wouldn't it make more sense
if you said X, instead of Y?". Such a comment, although in a form of
a question implies a certain "correct" answer.
The problem in directive commentary is that this type of commentary takes
the paper away from the student. Directive commentary is really editorial
comments, which "treats surface errors as if the paper is a finished
product" (Meyers and Smith 136). Directive commentary corrects problems
without the insight of the writer's ideas or purpose. This commentary also
gives the writer an answer, making better writing, but not a better writer.
Finally, directive commentary can also turn a writer off. Harsh comments
like No!!!, Wrong!, and KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) discourage writers
from future writing. As commentator we must "be careful about the amount
of control we exert over students when we read and comment on their paper"
(Straub
np).