The results to my e-survey were varied. The different personalities of my
peers lead to very different writing styles among them. The differences
ranged from writing six drafts of a paper and having several people, including
the professor, read and comment on it, to writing the whole paper at once,
revising as the paper is being written, and having no one else see the paper.
Some of my peers feel more comfortable doing all the work themselves, because
they are very confident in their writing ability, or have not found the
right person to read and revise their paper. Usually, the first person one
of my peers will take their paper to is their professor. Over and over again,
I found that students feel it helps the most when the professor helps them
with their ideas and/or their draft because the professor will be the one
grading the paper. This is logical, but I was disappointed that more people
do not try the writing center. Sometimes the center is more convenient than
meeting the professor because of scheduling, or the center can be a good
way to revise before students bring the paper to their professor.
I found that none of my friends reported any
major fears or anxieties going into the writing center, or going to their
professors. The only problems they worried about were that the tutors or
their peers who they asked to read their paper would not be critical enough
of their writing to help them. I do not know if all of my friends are simply
very confident, or if most students today feel the same way about their
papers. In Jennie Nelson's article, "Reading Classrooms as Text: Exploring
Student Writers' Interpretive Practices," she conducted a case study
on one college freshman named Kate, who kept a journal for her writing class.
In her journal, Kate wrote about going to the Writing Fellow, "he'll
probably tear it [my paper] apart anyway" and "I honestly dreaded
going to see my Writing Fellow," but after all of her worrying, she
"was pleasantly surprised" (Nelson, 414). Other examples of anxious
writers are a few of the freshmen who have visited the Writing Center while
I was apprenticing who have said, "My paper's really bad." This
lack of confidence is something we try to restore in the writing center
and according to a few friends that I surveyed, they have left the writing
center here, or at other schools, more confident about their papers or at
least more motivated to write and/or finish the paper than before. This
is a reinforcement of what Kenneth Bruffee purports that conferencing is
talking about the paper-its not necessarily "working" on the paper
(Bruffee, 91). Conversation is an activity most people like, especially
when they are talking about their own work. This conversation is what drives
students to work on something that they probably had not yet thoroughly
discussed with someone else and is why peer tutoring is so beneficial.
There were a few problems with our writing center
that perturbed me. One problem that was identified by a UR senior and English
major, who is now a Writing Fellow herself, was an experience at the Writing
Center with her first core paper. The tutor told her a lot about how
a paper should be written, but did not address if "what I had intended
to do had come out clearly," (Mary Mittell) which is what the student
really wanted to know. This may be a result of miscommunication between
the tutor and the tutee since the goal of that session was not clear to
the tutor. Another UR student had went to the writing center because he
was required to. His comments were "I was looking for conceptual help,
like with my main points and development . . . I found that I just didn't
like their ideas, they [the tutor] were on a different train of thought
than me. I didn't want to change the whole thing for them" (Thomas
Bagge, junior, Business major). A scary thought is that our writing tutors
may be spoon-feeding ideas to students. This student did not use the tutor's
ideas because he identified them as not his own, but other, less confident
writers may simply take the tutor's advice. This conference could have been
a fluke, but it may be a dangerous sign that tutors try to give students
ideas and do not focus enough on the student's organization and the conceptualization
of ideas.
An important task of the writing tutor is to
look past the content of the paper and focus on the organization and the
clarity of the paper, which is what Thomas's tutor should have done. Through
my survey, I found that some students are afraid that tutors or others who
help in revision will not understand the ideas in their paper. For example,
a UR senior and Computer Science major wrote that "I almost never have
someone else look over my paper on the grounds that it would take them too
long to figure out what the paper is actually on and if I am doing a good
job" (David Heidt). How can tutors look past the content of a paper
in order to help students who come to the writing center?
Click here for some suggestions
in my section on conferencing strategies.
Back to my E-Survey Questions
Back to Table of Contents